Debunking Shashi Tharoor's nomination as SG of the UN
Ok, so it is well-known that I am not a fan of Indian politics and/or politicians, regardless of their position across the spectrum. Today I would like to speak about a recent development that, on the surface looks great for India, but is in reality a GREAT example of how India's leaders sell the nation out.
In recent years India has striven to create UN reform, specifically, it has striven to become a permanent member of the UN Security Council. Without getting into the various arguments (veto power or not etc.) it is safe to say that India has failed miserably to insure itself such a seat. The fact that India is the 2nd most populous nation in the World...the fact that it is a fully-functioning (though off CHAOTIC) Democracy, and therefore a great model for the majority of the World...the fact that it is apart of the BRIC group (as well as other IBSA), which suggests it is one of the few nations that really has the chance to go from developing nation into an economic powerhouse not withstanding.
That being said, it also should highlight the fact that Congress Party (all but) promised India would get a Permanent Seat as part of its election campaign (and win) in 2004. The fact that a party can even make such a ludicrous campaign promise alone should suggest the state of Indian politics (like how Congress promised free electricity in AP...hmm, they are still waiting on that one huh? lol). Regardless of whether such a promise is reasonable, it is safe to say Congress has failed miserably.
So when recently India announced the candidature (and backing of the candidate) of Shashi Tharoor as the next Secretary General of the UN, I was aghast. Nevermind that it is improper protocol to do so. Nevermind that there is an unwritten rule that the Secretary General (SG) will not be of a "powerful nation".
Don't get me wrong, Shashi Tharoor is CERTAINLY qualified. In fact, there are few people out there who are more qualified, but let's look deeper. First and foremost, why would a nation back a candidate (which isn't proper protocol), especially one that doesn't even work in India? For that matter, why would India want a representative as the SG when it is a well-known point that only "lesser" countries are allowed to have SGs. Isn't this symbolic acceptance and acquiescence that India is not "a great power" or an "emerging great power"? Yes it is.
The answer is quite simple actually. Congress Party (who a friend of mine so precisely qualifed as "The Republicans of India", in that they are the "party of the heart/emotions", as opposed to Democrats -BJP perhaps?- who are the "party of the mind") has quite frankly FAILED. It has failed to procure a UN seat. It also knows the Indian people quite well, and knows that if an Indian becomes SG most voters (most are not quite educated to put it nicely) will be ecstatic, and well, that's more votes for Congress.
There is a huge problem here though. First, it is dhimittude acceptance that India is not a great power. Sure, its just symbolic, but politics is mainly symbolic anyway! Second, it is acceptance that India can't get a UN permanent seat, which it certainly deserves. Three, and this is BIG folks, if Shashi Tharoor does NOT act independent with regards to US interests, it will only make India seem like a lap-dog to US interests. Already, in the last 2 years since Congress has taken over the government the World has taken notice. Nuclear deal? Joint-exercises? Flip-flop on Iran? What is happening to India's foreign policy?! Congress has in 2 years shown that it prefers to be the lackey of US interests, which is something it has NEVER done before. If Tharoor does not prove to be overtly ANTI-American, the accusations that India has "sold out" will not only be loud, but probably even reasonable.
And if you don't think Tharoor would keep US interests in mind, than you are missing the "hidden story" behind this story. A man who works in Washington, do you not think that Washington and India have already discussed this well-before the actual candidature was announced? Shashi Tharoor's nomination is clearly a SOP that the US is giving India. It's saying "well we can't help you with the UN seat, but here, we'll give you the SG". Congress, in its usual SELL-OUT form will take that, cause it knows that the Indian people will be happy enough to ignore the UN seat. Moreover, the US knows that it will force India to "obey", because if it dont, well...it is slowly alienating itself and destroying its own independent foreign policy anyway, so it has no other choice.
THUS, I say, even though Shashi Tharoor is a great candidate, and even though he is Indian, I say NO to Shashi Tharoor...and certainly say NO, to the shenanigans of the Congress Party. Why India still deals with such crooks, I do not understand! :(
